top of page
Search
smcustompackaging8

The choice of packaging materials

Introduction

From the most classic to the most innovative, packaging in custom boxes are incredibly diverse, each with its associated production methods. Of course, the protection aspect remains fundamental here, but protection without the customer's appeal would be a mistake in your manufacturing process!


The choice of packaging materials

Glass

Transparent and perfectly healthy, glass is particularly appreciated for its precious appearance. But, on the other hand, glass is a 100% hygienic and bacteriologically inert material, making it a preferred choice in the food sector.

Heat resistant, you can prepare food in a jiffy and wash it after use with the same ease. Its transparent side also offers a very appreciable view of the product contained inside. And then, in the age of eco-design, difficult to compete with glass, reusable and recyclable endlessly!

Disadvantages:

  • Low impact resistance

  • Low heat conduction

  • Relatively high cost

Metallic materials

There are generally two main types of materials, steel and aluminum. Most of the time, steel is integrated with other materials to produce a finished product that is stronger and less vulnerable to corrosion.

Among metallic materials, we will most often meet:

For example, tinplate, a mixture of steel and tin, is widely used in custom packaging for small business food preservation (cans, cookie boxes, tins, etc.); it is also used as packaging for many industrial products such as aerosols or shoe polish. Disadvantage: corrosive.

Chromed iron is composed of steel and a layer of chromium, more resistant and less susceptible to corrosion—aluminum, long recognized for its lightness, stability, and many possibilities of use. Packaging for chocolates, cake mounds, aerosols and even the interior coating of certain milk and fruit juice cartons, aluminum is of all uses! Disadvantages: rather expensive, limited shapes.

Note that metallic materials, by definition, do not offer the possibility of taking a look at the contents of our packaging. Therefore, the opportunity to redouble creativity by opting for particular finishes will make a real difference against the competition!

Plastics

Controversial, perhaps, but plastic has long proven itself in terms of flexibility and practicality. Lightweight, versatile and very inexpensive, plastic is a staple in the agri-food sector, where it is simply available in a multitude of shapes and designs to surprise consumers constantly.

A pouring spout or an easy opening can be integrated into it at will, something that our competitors may not have the chance to do depending on the production methods and packaging materials chosen. As for the ecological dimension, we can see today that solutions are emerging here and there to counter the harmful effects of the material. PET, for example (polyethylene terephthalate), which is found more and more regularly in soft drinks, can be recycled endlessly!

Disadvantages:

Often not recyclable, but alternatives are progressing.

Cellulosic materials

How can we finally miss cellulosic materials made from wood, paper or cardboard? The food, fashion and cosmetics sectors have already made it a real institution. But, if they are so appealing, it is above all because they are light, inexpensive and incredibly versatile. In addition, they are one of those packaging materials capable of supporting different production and printing methods, with a wide variety of renderings.

Among the most famous, we find in particular:

Corrugated cardboard, the most common of all, splines can vary from one to four, depending on the product contained. Wood, a natural product sometimes supplemented by other materials for an optimal result.

Molded fiber, which is one of the most durable packaging materials today. For example, these are our egg cartons, totally biodegradable and obtained from recycled paper, but we can also find a wide variety of objects.

Disadvantages:

  • Less resistant than glass or metallic materials

  • Sensitive to humidity

  • Printing process and choice of inks

You are advancing in leaps and bounds! Still, there seem to be new choices to be made all the time. Which printing technique to choose when the time is right? There are five globally, each with its specificities.

Offset printing

Choose for solid board and paper.

It is difficult to miss offset printing as it is recognized. The process takes place here flat and offers high-end renderings with incomparable finishes. The ink dries by oxidation, and printing is most often done in a four-color process, in other words using the four basic colours: magenta, cyan, yellow and black.

Use a Pantone- like a color chart to define exactly what you need! Given its relatively low cost, offset printing will suit both large runs and small runs.

Disadvantages:

  • Fragile printing plates

  • Paper-intensive implementation depending on the project

Digital printing:

To be chosen for small and medium series. Here the design is transferred directly from the computer to the printer, reducing costs and production time. In addition, it is print quality comparable to offset allows the design of very high-quality packaging.

Disadvantages:

  • Usually non-recyclable ink

  • Unstable color retention

  • Not suitable for large print runs

Flexographic printing

Choose for large prints on corrugated cardboard. Flexographic printing is suitable for all types of media and will withstand both water-based and oil-based inks. Its principle vaguely evokes that of an ink pad on a very large scale and, if it is not yet extremely widespread, it is gaining wide popularity in the packaging sector, where it also allows the design of pretty personalized labels.

Disadvantages:

Reproduction of complex images due to the sensitivity of the setting

Screen printing

Namely, for corrugated cardboard, plastic adapted to flat, or 3D supports, both small and large formats will make room for screen printing. As a stencil, it offers reliable results that are compatible with many types of media!



Disadvantages:

  • Less finesse than with other techniques

  • Expensive method for large runs


4 views0 comments

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page